John Reed Stark, a former SEC chairperson, says the burden of proof is always on the SEC to prove that a product is a security. As far as I know, judges only ask the SEC to prove that people who buy Binance products are "investors" who buy Binance products because they want prices to go up, not "customers" who buy Binance products because the products offer some utility (such as a trading discount).
According to the judge, a digital asset security "ceases to be a security" if it is somehow transformed into a utility rather than an investment speculative vehicle. Notably, the judge explicitly rejected the perplexing finding in Ripple's ruling that there must be some kind of contractual relationship between an investor and an issuer in a secondary market to trigger the registration requirement, a conclusion that no other district court has ever adopted or even cited in any form of support.
Former SEC Chairperson: The burden of proof always lies with the SEC to prove that a product is a security
2024-06-29 22:41:46
Sec chairperson john reed stark stated burden of proof Ren alwaysdesk3cryptocurrencydesktopCrypto News
Disclaimer:
1. The information provided does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent decisions and bear all risks themselves.
2. The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the stance or position of this website.
Previous article:
前SEC主席:举证责任始终在于SEC,以证明某项产品属于证券Next article:
今日恐慌与贪婪指数为30