Ripple recently won an unmistakable monetary victory in a class-action securities lawsuit, with the judge dismissing most of the lawsuit. But the judge also confused the spotlight on a larger issue by suggesting that XRP could be a security and therefore require tighter regulation, a departure from last year's high-profile ruling.
The contradictory rulings by the two judges - one called XRP a security, the other said it was essentially not - are symptomatic of a larger problem: the lack of legal and regulatory clarity in the U.S. cryptocurrency industry. Unless Congress or a higher court makes a clear ruling, projects like Ripple could become even more chaotic.
Moish Peltz, a partner at Falcon, Rappaport and Berkman, a New York law firm, explains: "The question of whether XRP is a security has not been resolved, at least for this collateral cause of action."
Analysis: Despite Ripple's victory, it remains to be seen whether XRP will be subject to stricter regulation
2024-06-28 19:35:32
Disclaimer:
1. The information provided does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent decisions and bear all risks themselves.
2. The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the stance or position of this website.
Previous article：
分析：尽管Ripple胜诉，但XRP是否会受更严格监管仍是未知数Next article：
美股三大指数集体收跌
