A California judge has rejected a class-action lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft accusing the companies of illegally using their personal data to train artificial intelligence systems, including ChatGPT, on the grounds that the plaintiffs failed to provide a short and clear statement.
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said: "While the length of the complaint alone is unlikely to result in a dismissal of the prosecution, it is appropriate to dismiss the prosecution under Rule 8 (a) when the complaint is overly long and contains a great deal of irrelevant, distracting or redundant information. He added that in addition to its length, the complaint contains a great deal of unnecessary and distracting allegations, making it nearly impossible to determine whether the plaintiff's legal claims are sufficient."
However, the judge noted that the plaintiffs had the right to amend the pleadings, but hoped that they would be dismissed if the amended pleadings contained irrelevant information and interfered with the clarity of the relevant legal claims.
The judge rejected a class-action lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft
2024-05-25 23:49:31
Disclaimer:
1. The information provided does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent decisions and bear all risks themselves.
2. The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the stance or position of this website.
Previous article：
法官驳回针对OpenAI和微软的集体诉讼Next article：
NEAR链上原生发行USDC突破2亿美元
