The COPA v. Obencong ruling has now been released, and the latter has repeatedly lied to the court

According to BitMEX Research, the ruling in the case of COPA (Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance) against Craig Wright has now been announced.
At the sentencing, Craig Wright was nowhere near as clever as he thought he was. In his written testimony and several days of oral testimony during cross-examination, there was complete conviction that Wright lied extensively and repeatedly to the court. Most of his lies were related to documents he had forged that were designed to support his claims. All of his lies and forged documents were made to support his biggest lie: his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
The truth is much simpler. However, because Dr. Wright has lied so much over the years, in some ways it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what actually happened. These difficulties do not affect the fact that Dr. Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
As far as the so-called evidence supporting his claims is concerned, the evidence is at best questionable or highly suspicious, or entirely accidental, and at worst, they are fabricated and/or based on documents that Dr. Wright is convinced to have massively falsified.
These fabrications and falsifications were revealed in the evidence received in the trial case. It is for this reason that this judgment contains a wealth of technical and other details, which are intended to shed light on the true scale of his false claims to prove that he is/was Satoshi Nakamoto. These details were laid out in exhaustive written closing arguments prepared by COPA and the developers and further highlighted in their oral closing arguments.