CZ wrote on the X platform that if the project party is dissatisfied with the exchange's request for "airdrop" or "listing fee", it can choose not to pay; if the project is strong enough, the exchange will naturally rush to list its tokens. He pointed out:
Projects with strong strength are not in demand, and instead should reflect on the attribution of value.
If you question the listing fee he charges, you can set it to 0, "or even set all fees to 0".
If the holder is dissatisfied that the currency is not listed, they should contact the project party, not the exchange; DEX can also be used.
PancakeSwap has no listing fee and high transaction volume.
He also listed the listing models of different exchanges, including "full chain open listing", "fee screening model", "airdrop + margin to prevent fraud", etc., emphasizing that different models are feasible. Finally, he suggested that project parties should focus on their own construction, rather than complaining about others.
CZ issued a response to the dispute over the "listing fee": strong projects have no demand, and the project side should focus on its own construction
2025-10-15 09:52:03
Disclaimer:
1. The information provided does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent decisions and bear all risks themselves.
2. The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the stance or position of this website.
Previous article：
CZ发文回应关于“上币费”的争议：实力强的项目无需求上所，项目方应专注自身建设Next article：
香港金管局公布第二期GenA.I.沙盒参与者名单
