The SEC just objected to an "emergency request for conclusive evidence" filed on April 4 by Justin W. Keener in Ripple's favor.
The SEC opposed the motion because they said:
The district court has no jurisdiction over the request because the case has been moved to the Second Circuit.
2) Keener failed to make an appropriate intervention motion.
3) It is not necessary because, as SEC lawyers have pointed out, Ripple is capable enough to decide for itself whether the "evidence" in question will help its case
For these reasons, the Securities Exchange Commission asked Judge Torres to reject the request entirely.
SEC objects to "urgent request for conclusive evidence"
2025-04-08 19:24:42
Disclaimer:
1. The information provided does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent decisions and bear all risks themselves.
2. The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the stance or position of this website.
Previous article：
SEC对“紧急请求提供决定性证据”提出反对意见Next article：
白宫数字资产政策顾问：美国数字资产和金融科技创新时代已经到来，而且才刚刚开始
