Hasu, a Safe investor, posted on social media that while the Bybit theft was due to a breach of the Safe front end rather than the Bybit infrastructure, Bybit's infrastructure was not sufficient to monitor such a simple hack. When transferring more than $1 billion, there is no reason not to verify the integrity of the message on a second offline machine. If the blame is placed on SAFE rather than Bybit here, the wrong lesson has been learned entirely.
In response, Wintermute founder wishfulcynic.eth responded that his remarks were somewhat confusing and distorted (gaslighting effect).
Hasu countered its series of comments that it was difficult to answer whether Safe was wrong in the incident (not because he was an investor in Safe). Safe provides a solution through a centralized front end, but it should never be relied on entirely. It believes that Safe's biggest problem is not working with big-money customers to educate them about security. The hacking of Safe developer devices is also one of the problems, but it is more important to learn from it.
Hasu refutes controversy for Safe, Wintermute founder says his remarks distort facts
2025-02-26 23:00:27
Disclaimer:
1. The information provided does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent decisions and bear all risks themselves.
2. The copyright of this content belongs to the original author. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the stance or position of this website.
Previous article：
Hasu为Safe辩驳引争议，Wintermute创始人称其言论扭曲事实Next article：
10年期美债收益率跌向4.24%
